[Convexity hyperostotic meningioma en plaque: a systematic review]. / Ploskostnye giperostoticheskie meningiomy svoda cherepa. Sistematicheskii obzor literatury.

BACKGROUND: Planar hyperostotic meningiomas account for 2-9% of intracranial meningiomas. They are characterized by planar node following the contours of the inner surface of the skull. Hyperostosis is present in most cases. Timely diagnosis of skull base tumors is usually simple due to early involvement of the cranial nerves. However, convexity meningiomas en plaque usually reach large dimensions that complicates surgery and radiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the current state of diagnosis, molecular biology and surgical treatment of hyperostotic meningiomas en plaque. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Searching for literature data included the following keywords: «planar meningioma¼, «hyperostotic meningioma¼, «meningioma en plaque¼, «infiltrative meningioma¼. We reviewed the PubMed and Google Scholar databases until May 2023 and enrolled only full-text Russian-, English- or French-language reports. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Among primary 332 reports, 35 references met the inclusion criteria. We found less severity or absence of focal neurological symptoms, comparable incidence of intracranial hypertension and no histological differences between planar and nodular meningiomas. Analysis of molecular biological features of planar meningiomas, including cell cultures, is feasible. There is no consensus regarding surgical treatment and radiotherapy. Most publications are case reports. CONCLUSION: The results of treatment of planar hyperostotic meningiomas, especially large and giant ones, are unsatisfactory. There is no a generally accepted algorithm for treating patients in the literature. This problem requires further research.

[Comparison of methods of treatment of meningiomas invading the superior sagittal sinus]. / Sravnitel'naya otsenka metodov lecheniya meningiom, invaziruyushchikh verkhnii sagittal'nyi sinus.

There are various approaches to the treatment of patients with parasagittal meningiomas. OBJECTIVE: To optimize treatment strategy for meningiomas invading the superior sagittal sinus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 87 patients with benign parasagittal meningiomas between 2010 and 2012. Of these, 34 patients underwent surgery alone, 27 - radiotherapy, 26 - surgery and subsequent radiotherapy. Both groups were comparable in male-to-female ratio, age and localization of tumors in relation to superior sagittal sinus. The follow-up period was at least 5 years. We analyzed the effect of treatment on neurological status, Karnofsky score and tumor growth control. RESULTS: Mean volume of tumors was 43.3 cm3 in patients undergoing surgery and 6.7 cm3 in the radiotherapy group. In the combined treatment group, mean volume was 65.8 cm3 before surgery and 8.8 cm3 before irradiation. General cerebral symptoms (84%), epileptic seizures (37%) and movement disorders (31%) prevailed. Surgery provided the best results in patients with small meningiomas (<14 cm3) causing focal neurological symptoms. Isolated radiotherapy was the most effective in asymptomatic patients. Large tumors required surgery with adjuvant irradiation. CONCLUSION: Benign parasagittal meningiomas followed by focal neurological symptoms require surgical intervention regarding the best functional outcomes and tumor growth control. Radiotherapy without surgery is advisable for progressive asymptomatic tumors. Resection followed by irradiation is preferable if total resection without the risk of damage to veins and cortex is impossible.